Spinal myxopapillary ependymoma with interval drop metastasis presenting as cauda equina syndrome: case report and review of literature
Case Report

Spinal myxopapillary ependymoma with interval drop metastasis presenting as cauda equina syndrome: case report and review of literature

Shrikant V. Rege, Sharadendu Narayan, Harshad Patil, Abhishek Songara

Sri Aurobindo Medical College and P.G Institute, Indore, India

Correspondence to: Sharadendu Narayan. Sri Aurobindo Medical College and P.G Institute, Indore, India. Email: sharad_jsr@yahoo.com.

Abstract: Myxopapillary ependymoma is a benign slow-growing tumour, arising predominantly in the region of the filum terminale. It has been designated histologically as grade I neoplasm according to the 2007 WHO classification. Despite this benign character dissemination and metastasis along the cerebrospinal axis and metastasis to distant sites have occasionally been reported. There have been previously reported cases of drop metastasis from MPE, however in three of these cases the drop metastasis was diagnosed with concurrent primary spinal MPE. There has been only one previously published case of interval drop metastasis in a case of operated spinal MPE in literature. We hereby present the second case of interval drop metastasis in a case of conus MPE, with history of having undergone a subtotal resection and post operative adjuvant radiotherapy prior to second surgery. The patient presented months after the primary surgery with symptoms of cauda equina syndrome attributable to the drop metastasis.

Keywords: Myxopapillary ependymoma; drop metastasis; cauda equina syndrome; adjuvant radiotherapy


Submitted Mar 29, 2016. Accepted for publication Jul 22, 2016.

doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.08.06


Introduction

Spinal ependymomas are rare tumors, with an incidence of approximately 0.2/100,000 population with a slight male predominance. Approximately 0.5% of all ependymomas are classified as myxopapillary, thus having an incidence of 0.01 per million population (1,2). No specific risk factors for the development of ependymoma have been identified, although associations with neurofibromatosis type 2 and lack of maternal consumption of prenatal vitamins have been suggested (3). The prognosis for World Health Organization (WHO) grade I ependymoma, of which, MPE is a sub-type, is very good. The 1-year and 10-year survival rates for WHO Grade I ependymoma are 100% and 93% respectively (3).


Case presentation

Past treatment history

The patient had previously undergone lumbar spine surgery 1 year ago for complaints of low back pain and weakness of bilateral lower limbs. The patient had undergone a T12–L1 laminectomy with excision of a conus intradural extramedullary tumor at L1–L2 level (Figure 1). Patient had no associated symptoms of bowel or bladder dysfunction at this time. Tumor HPE was suggestive of a Myxopapillary ependymoma (Figure 2). Operative notes suggested, a subtotal resection of the tumor was done owing to the adherence of tumor to the cauda equina roots. A post-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan dorso lumbar spine was performed after 1 month which showed an irregular heterogeneously enhancing intradural mass lesion extending from T12–L1 level to L1–L2 level. Lesion was involving the filum terminale and cauda equina roots (Figure 3).

Figure 1 Initial pre-operative MRI T2 sagittal showing initial lesion at L1–L2 level.
Figure 2 Histopathological image suggestive of myxopapillary ependymoma (40×).
Figure 3 Post-operative sagittal MRI scan showing residual lesion at L1–L2 level as seen on (A) (T2W image), (B) (T1W image) & (C) (post contrast image).

Postoperative radiotherapy for residual tumor was planned. Patient was referred to radiation oncology for adjuvant radiotherapy. A treatment plan offering best therapeutic benefit both in terms of optimum dose to target tissue and maximum sparing of the uninvolved organs was selected. Patient was given a total of 54 Gy over 30 cycles (45 Gy/25# to PTV and 9 Gy/5# to the PTV1) on DMX Varian Linear Accelerator. The patient tolerated the adjuvant radiotherapy well and noticed a marked improvement of pain and weakness symptoms 1 month after the radiotherapy. Follow up scans were done 1 month and 6 months after radiotherapy. A small residual lesion was visualized at T12-L1 level on both the scans. However, there was no evidence of any new lesions in the spinal cord. Patient had an improvement in the low back pain and the lower limb paresis after radiation therapy. However, 8 months after radiation therapy, the patient started experiencing low back pain and the lower limb paresis symptoms associated with signs & symptoms of cauda equina syndrome.

Present treatment history

A 24 years male presented to the neurosurgery OPD with the complaints of low back pain radiating to both lower limbs for the past 5 months. The patient also had complains of weakness of bilateral lower limbs (left > right) for the past 2 months. He noted decreased sensation over the lower limb and buttocks for the past 1 month. There were episodes of intermittent dribbling of urine and constipation for the past 1 month. A thorough neurological examination was done. Patient was found to have left foot drop with weakness of left knee extensors, bilateral ankle flexor/extensor weakness with bilateral extensor hallusis longus weakness. Patient had decreased muscle tone left lower limb with thinning of the left lower limb. The knee, ankle and plantar reflexes were bilaterally absent. Patient had normal abdominal & cremastric reflexes with absent bulbocavernous and anal reflexes. Anal tone was lax. Patient underwent a MRI dorso lumbar spine on present admission as his examination was suggestive of cauda equina region pathology.

MRI showed an irregular enhancing intradural mass lesion along anterior aspect of lower cord and conus extending from T12–L1 level up to the L2 mid vertebral body level. Patient also had an irregular enhancing lesion within spinal canal from L4 to S2 level consistent with drop metastasis (Figure 4). This new lesion developed far below the anatomical location of previous tumor. This lesion was seen extending to epidural space with involvement of the posterior body of L4, L5 S1 & S2 vertebra. Patient underwent re-exploration, a T11–L3 laminectomy was done with debulking of tumor. Gross total resection was not possible owing to dense adhesion of tumor capsule with surrounding lumbosacral nerve roots. Dural closure was done with macroscopic tumor still present. HPE was suggestive of myxopapillary ependymoma, similar to previously resected tumor.

Figure 4 Present pre-operative sagittal MRI scans showing residual lesion at l1-l2 level and a new lesion is seen at L5–S2 level with involvement of vertebral bodies and drop metastasis on, (A) (T2W image), (B) (T1W image) & (C) (post contrast image).

Patient duly received a radiation oncology referral post operatively and was taken up for local re irradiation of residual tumor. Patient received a total of 54 Gy over 30 cycles (45 Gy/25# to PTV and 9 Gy/5# to the PTV1) on DMX Varian Linear Accelerator.

Patient had a Nurick Grade 4 (Difficulty in walking needing assistance) prior to radiation therapy which improved to Nurick Grade 3 (Difficulty in walking not needing regular assistance) with no improvement in bladder dysfunction symptoms. The patient had a gradual worsening in motor power 6 months after radiotherapy with worsening of low back pain.

Post radiation MRI scan was done which was suggestive of lower dorsal spine D11–D12 spine involvement with multiple nodular lesions within spinal canal from lumbar to sacral region suggestive of metastatic deposits (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Present post-operative sagittal MRI scans showing involvement of lower dorsal d11-d12, lumbar and sacral vertebral bodies with multiple nodular lesions within spinal canal from lumbar to sacral region suggestive of metastatic deposits on (A) (T2W image), (B) (T1W image) & (C) (post contrast image).

Discussion

Ependymoma is an uncommon central nervous system neoplasm, usually seen in children and young adults. Myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) was first described as a variant of ependymoma by Kernohan in 1932 (4). MPE is usually located in the cauda equina and filum terminale regions, and characterized by the production of mucin and formation of papillae. Cauda equina MPEs are assumed to arise from the ependymal cell nests normally present in the filum terminale. The reason for the myxopapillary appearance is not well understood; ultra structural evidence shows that the myxoid material represents excess basement membrane material deposition around the tumor cells induced by the abnormal juxtaposition of collagen that abuts directly onto ependymal cells in the normal filum terminale. MPE is a slow-glowing tumor and is designated histologically as grade I neoplasm according to the 2007 World Health Organization classification (1).

Pathologically there are four types of ependymomas, namely: typical, anaplastic, subependymoma and myxopapillary. Among these, mainly anaplastic ependymomas are known to spread to multiple sites in the spine and cranial cavity (5,6). Rare cases of tumor spread from the spine retrograde to the cranium and extraneural spread to liver and lungs from the spine have been reported in literature (7). Peripheral metastasis has also been described, including one case of local tumor reoccurrence forty years after initial therapy with concomitant metastases in the lungs, liver, and lymph nodes (7).

Single institution retrospective studies suggest, younger age, high tumor grade and failure to achieve GTR are poor prognostic factors for patients with ependymoma (2,8). However larger population based study from the surveillance, epidemiology, end results database suggested that older age rather than younger age group was associated with a poorer prognosis (9). Recent investigations have started focusing on newer pathologic and immunohistochemical markers of prognosis. A study has shown increased mitotic index, increased cellularity, presence of Ki-67, and presence of cyclin D1 as independent markers of mortality in ependymomas (10). However, no such studies have focused solely on MPE. The most common presenting symptoms of spinal MPE include pain, weakness, and sensory changes. Symptoms of bowel, bladder, and/or sexual dysfunction may be seen depending on the tumor location. MPE is a benign tumor but has various growth patterns and metastatic modes. Metastatic spread of MPE is infrequent and, when it does occur, the disease tends to spread in the rostral direction within the central nervous system (11). Intracranial metastasis is the most common site for MPE spread. A recent review described 19 such cases and found a variety of intracranial sites involved including the telencephalon, the brainstem, and the cerebellum. The time span to presentation of metastasis also varied wildly, from 1 month to 13 years following primary tumor resection in one series (12). Previously published reports of drop metastases in patients with MPE are scarce. Reports mention cases where drop metastases were discovered simultaneously with the primary tumor (13,14). Metastases have been reported up to 20 years after initial treatment, emphasizing the role for extremely long-term follow up in patients treated for MPE (15).

One case reported drop metastases from a T11-L2 primary MPE to the distal thecal sac, similar to the patient reported here. However this patient was a 13 year old girl and the metastasis was found on the initial MRI scan (1). An additional case report describes a 22-year-old man who presented with MPE lesions in the third ventricle and sacral spinal canal; he was hypothesized to have a drop metastasis by the authors, though both lesions were again found simultaneously (13). There has been only one previously reported case where an adult patient presented with secondary MPE drop metastases following an initial subtotal resection and post-operative radiotherapy of the tumor bed of a primary MPE similar to our case (16). To our knowledge this is the only reported case in literature of a MPE with interval drop metastasis presenting as cauda equina syndrome.


Conclusions

The various cases mentioned in the recent literature suggest a higher incidence of CNS dissemination of MPEs than previously thought. This holds true at the time of diagnosis and during the subsequent follow up. Screening of the entire CNS axis at the time of diagnosis and during follow up is recommended. The limited data on treatment of MPE indicates, radiotherapy is efficacious for residual tumor following subtotal resection and for metastatic disease. Long-term survival has been documented in MPE patients though continued follow up is warranted to look for interval metastasis.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.


References

  1. McLendon RE, Rosenblum MK, Schiffer D, et al. Myxopapillary ependymoma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Weistler OD, et al. editors. WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2007:72-3.
  2. McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG. Incidence patterns for ependymoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study. J Neurosurg 2009;110:725-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Reni M, Gatta G, Mazza E, et al. Ependymoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007;63:81-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Kernohan JW. Primary tumors of the spinal cord and intradural filum terminale. In: Penfield W. Cytology and cellular pathology of the nervous system. New York: Hoeber; 19323;3:993-1025.
  5. Mørk SJ, Risberg G, Krogness K. Case report. Anaplastic ependymoma of the spinal cord. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1980;6:307-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Nagańska E, Matyja E, Zabek M, et al. Disseminated spinal and cerebral ependymoma with unusual histological pattern: clinicopathological study of a case with retrograde tumor spread. Folia Neuropathol 2000;38:135-41. [PubMed]
  7. Graf M, Blaeker H, Otto HF. Extraneural metastasizing ependymoma of the spinal cord. Pathol Oncol Res 1999;5:56-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Armstrong TS, Vera-Bolanos E, Bekele BN, et al. Adult ependymal tumors: prognosis and the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Neuro Oncol 2010;12:862-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Milano MT, Johnson MD, Sul J, et al. Primary spinal cord glioma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database study. J Neurooncol 2010;98:83-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Zawrocki A, Iżycka-Świeszewska E, Papierz W, et al. Analysis of the prognostic significance of selected morphological and immunohistochemical markers in ependymomas, with literature review. Folia Neuropathol 2011;49:94-102. [PubMed]
  11. Davis C, Barnard RO. Malignant behavior of myxopapillary ependymoma. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 1985;62:925-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Chakraborti S, Govindan A, Alapatt JP, et al. Primary myxopapillary ependymoma of the fourth ventricle with cartilaginous metaplasia: a case report and review of the literature. Brain Tumor Pathol 2012;29:25-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Fassett DR, Pingree J, Kestle JR. The high incidence of tumor dissemination in myxopapillary ependymoma in pediatric patients. Report of five cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2005;102:59-64. [PubMed]
  14. Wang M, Wang H, Zhou Y, et al. Myxopapillary ependymoma in the third ventricle area and sacral canal: dropped or retrograde metastasis? Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2013;53:237-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Fegerl G, Marosi C. Stabilization of metastatic myxopapillary ependymoma with sorafenib. Rare Tumors 2012;4:e42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Bates JE, Peterson CR 3rd, Yeaney GA, et al. Spinal drop metastasis in myxopapillary ependymoma: a case report and a review of treatment options. Rare Tumors 2014;6:5404. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Rege SV, Narayan S, Patil H, Songara A. Spinal myxopapillary ependymoma with interval drop metastasis presenting as cauda equina syndrome: case report and review of literature. J Spine Surg 2016;2(3):216-221. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.08.06