How to cite item

Post-operative drain use in patients undergoing decompression and fusion: incidence of complications and symptomatic hematoma

  
@article{JSS4175,
	author = {Owoicho Adogwa and Aladine A. Elsamadicy and Amanda R. Sergesketter and Ronnie L. Shammas and Sohrab Vatsia and Victoria D. Vuong and Syed Khalid and Joseph Cheng and Carlos A. Bagley and Isaac O. Karikari},
	title = {Post-operative drain use in patients undergoing decompression and fusion: incidence of complications and symptomatic hematoma},
	journal = {Journal of Spine Surgery},
	volume = {4},
	number = {2},
	year = {2018},
	keywords = {},
	abstract = {Background: Surgical drains are commonly used after spine surgery to minimize infection and hematoma formation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of post-operative complications after spinal decompression and fusion with and without a subfascial drain.
Methods: The medical records of 139 adult (≥18 years old) spinal deformity patients undergoing elective spinal decompression and fusion at a major academic institution were reviewed. We identified 116 (83.5%) who had a post-operative drain and 23 (16.5%) who did not have a postoperative drain (No-Drain: n=23; Drain-Use: n=116). Patient demographics, comorbidities, intra- and post-operative complication rates were collected for each patient. The primary outcome investigated in this study was the rate of post-operative complications, specifically surgical site infections (SSI) and hematoma formation. 
Results: Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between both cohorts, with the body mass index (BMI) slightly higher in the Drain-Use cohort (No-Drain: 26.1 kg/m2 vs. Drain-Use: 29.1 kg/m2, P=0.02). Operative time and the median number of levels fused were similar between the cohorts. The postoperative complications profile was similar between both cohorts, including deep and superficial SSIs (P=0.52 and P=0.66, respectively), and incidence of hematoma formation (P=0.66). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly higher for the Drain-use cohort compared to the No-Drain cohort (5.0 vs. 2.8 days, P},
	issn = {2414-4630},	url = {https://jss.amegroups.org/article/view/4175}
}